VM202 is protected and efficient for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy

VM202, a plasmid DNA that expresses 2 isoforms of hepatocyte growth factor, is both safe and effective in providing sustained pain relief in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), according to results from a Phase 3-1b study published in Clinical and Translational Science.

Following positive efficacy and safety results from Phase 1 and Phase 2 studies, the researchers conducted a large-scale, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 study of VM202 against painful DPN. The study was carried out in two parts: The main study took place over 9 months (DPN 3-1; ID NCT02427464; N = 500 participants), followed by a non-interventional 3-month safety and efficacy extension that covered a subset of comprised main study participants enrolled later (DPN 3-1b; NCT04055090; n = 101).

The researchers hypothesized that administration of VM202 would lower the average daily pain scores for diabetic peripheral neuropathy more than for placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the average pain score on the numerical rating scale after 24 hours recorded in a daily pain and sleep diary after 3 months.

In both studies, most of the participants were white (74.4% and 80.2%) with a mean age of 61.5 years. Many participants had comorbid conditions, including high blood pressure, dyslipidemia, and obesity.

The demographics and baseline characteristics between groups were similar. At the time of randomization, approximately half of the participants were not receiving either pregabalin or gabapentin to administer DPN.

Researchers rated safety based on the incidence of treatment-related adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse events of special concern (injection site reactions, ophthalmic or acute cardiac events, foot ulcers, and symptoms of central nervous system depression).

In DPN 3-1, 72.6% of VM202-treated patients and 68.9% of placebo-treated patients reported at least one treatment-related adverse event. The most common adverse events were infections and infestations, which were similar between groups.

Adverse events of special interest occurred in 17.2% and 16.8% of the VM202 and placebo patients, respectively. The most common adverse events were diabetic retinopathy, peripheral edema, and skin ulcers. The incidence of these events considered to be related to the study drug was low, with no difference between the groups.

Serious adverse events were reported in 9.6% of the VM202 group and 9.9% of the placebo group. In the VM202 group, adenocarcinoma and vitreous hemorrhage were considered “possibly related to the study drug”. Three myocardial infarctions were considered unrelated to the study drug based on the patient’s medical history.

In DPN 3-1b, treatment-related adverse events occurred in 15.4% and 22.2% of the patients treated with VM202 and placebo, respectively. Adverse events of particular concern, including peripheral edema, chest pain, and angina, were observed in 3.1% and 2.8% of VM202 and placebo-treated patients, respectively. One participant in the VM202 group and two in the placebo group reported serious adverse events, but all three participants had relevant medical histories.

DPN 3-1 did not meet the primary endpoints, with differences between groups for no endpoint measurement being statistically significant. When the participants who did not receive concomitant gabapentinoids were analyzed separately (n = 251), the endpoints did not remain statistically significant compared to placebo.

In DPN 3-1b, the effectiveness data differed “noticeably” despite the similar demographic and basic characteristics of the participants. Although there was no significant difference in pain severity at baseline, there was a significant reduction in primary efficacy endpoints in the VM202 group after 12 months compared to placebo. Significant pain reductions were also seen at 6 and 9 months, and greater pain reductions were seen in patients who did not take gabapentin or pregabalin during the 12 month study, consistent with results from the Phase 2 study.

The researchers stated, “To the best of our knowledge, this is the first phase 3 gene therapy study for pain that has ever been conducted. VM202 did not meet efficacy endpoints in the entire population, but VM202 demonstrated long-term, clinically significant pain reduction [DPN 3-1b], Especially in [participants] not on gabapentinoids ”

They concluded: “Given the excellent safety profile of VM202, the potential for disease-modifying effects, and the high unmet medical need of the DPN patient population who are not receiving gabapentinoids, further studies are needed.”

Disclosure: This clinical study was supported by Helixmith Inc. For a full list of the author’s disclosures, see the original reference.


Kessler JA, Shaibani A., Sang CN et al .; for the VM202 study group. Gene Therapy for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study Using VM202, a plasmid DNA that codes for human hepatocyte growth factor. Published online January 19, 2021. Clin Transl Sci. doi: 10.1111 / cts.12977

This article originally appeared on Clinical Pain Advisor

Related Articles